Persimmon Alley Press
Persimmon Alley Press
  • About Persimmon Alley Press
  • Books
    • Close Encounters with the Cold War
    • Mother's Century: A Survivor, Her People and Her Times
    • Encounters: Ten Appointments with History
    • Killer Protocols
    • Clean Coal Killers
    • The Killer Trees
    • A Feast of Famine
    • Molly Malice in Alterland
    • Alligator In My Basement
    • Sudden Addiction
    • The Flesh of the Cedarwood
  • Smoke the Dottle
  • Richard's Rants
  • Contact

Rant 657: My Annual Defense Spending Lament

10/15/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
​While congressional Republicans and Democrats battle over spending a few trillion dollars over ten years designed to improve the lives of millions of Americans, both parties think nothing of authorizing more than twice as much for the Department of Defense. They vote by huge bipartisan majorities in favor of spending more than $7.5 trillion (highly likely an underestimate) over the next decade in order to prepare to fight the last conventional war.
 
The end of the Cold War has not changed the deeply ingrained assumption that the future will look like the past. Is it really necessary to spend more than $750 billion a year to maintain a military ill-suited for the battlegrounds of the twenty-first century? We are unlikely to go to war with our nation-state adversaries—China and Iran. Chinese saber-rattling over Taiwan does not mean that the U.S. would recklessly confront China militarily in its own backyard. Similarly, Iran’s inching closer to possessing nuclear weapons, a regrettable outcome of Donald Trump’s imprudent trashing of the Iran nuclear agreement, won’t lead to a war against a regional military power on its home turf 6,500 miles away. Moreover, the havoc Iran could wreak on tankers transporting Middle Eastern oil through the Persian Gulf, which would do incalculable economic damage to Western economies, would give us pause.
 
Our annual defense budgets invariably include absurdly expensive programs and weapons that are at best unnecessary and all-too-often unusable The first proposed Biden defense budget has us spending more in 2021 dollars than we did in any year of the Vietnam War or the madcap  defense spending spree of the Reagan era. This is nuts!
 
The U.S. spends more for defense than the next eleven big spending nations—China, India, Russia, United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, Germany, France, Japan, South Korea, Italy, and Australia—combined. We have 20 aircraft carriers (a.k.a., sitting ducks); China has two; Russia one. We spend billions on high-tech planes that don’t work, like the snake-bitten F-35 Strikefighter, and on weapons that have proven ineffective in counter-insurgencies against rag-tag bunches of non-state actors like ISIS or the Taliban.
 
A more than adequate defense could be had for only a third of our current outlay. It would still be sufficient to deter any potential adversary. We could then redirect resources to the kinds of conflicts that represent the real threats to us—pandemics, climate change, domestic terrorists and income and wealth inequality.
 
Why do we blindly persist in gross overspending on defense, on focusing our planning on fighting improbable wars against nation-states, on being able to fight two-and-a half-front wars simultaneously, and on developing monumentally expensive weapons systems that are ineffective against the real external dangers we face? The answer is complex.
 
First, the cabal that President Eisenhower warned us against in his valedictory when he left office:  “…we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence…by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” More than 50,000 U.S. companies provide goods and services to the Department of Defense (DoD). They come from every congressional district and contribute millions of dollars to congressional campaigns.
 
Second, the rivalry between the armed services over budget money. The top minds in the Army, Navy and Air Force are not directed at our external enemies. Instead, they focus on their service rivals. I witnessed this personally during a decade as a DoD employee and consultant.
 
Third, the standard career path for retiring generals, admirals and other top brass is to move from DoD to the “Beltway Bandits,” the thousands of defense contractors willing to pay for easy access to their former DoD colleagues and members of Congress who control the purse strings.
 
Fourth, the fear of members of Congress of being labeled “soft on defense,” a worry especially felt by Democrats despite their mindless enthusiasm for excessive defense spending.
 
Fifth, the unraveling of the nuclear arms control agreements that prior presidents reached with the Soviets and their Russian successors that contributed to maintaining peace between the superpowers for so many years. Bipartisan support for them has eroded as the Republican Party has gone rogue, abandoning its suspicion of and hostility toward Russia, a price of currying favor with its Putin-admiring, autocratic cult leader, Donald Trump.
 
In sum, powerful economic and political interests overwhelm any rational assessment of our defense needs. The public needs to understand that we are wasting tax dollars on defense that could be applied to the crying needs of society that, if addressed, would go a long way to make this country stronger and more secure.
 
The performative hand-wringing by Senators Manchin and Sinema and others over the size of the human infrastructure bill currently before Congress is misplaced. Their real attention should be on the trillions we are going to squander on defense over the next ten years. Defense spending has too long been protected from the scrutiny it deserves. Changing the national conversation about it depends on the media and on voters armed with far better information about what is going on here. It is a very steep slope, but one very much worth ascending.
 
Dick Hermann
October 15, 2021

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    Richard Hermann is the author of thirteen books, including Encounters: Ten Appointments with History and, most recently, Mother's Century: A Survivor, Her People and Her Times. Soon to be released is his upcoming Close Encounters with the Cold War, a personal reflection on growing up in the nuclear age. He is a former law professor and entrepreneur, and the founder and president of Federal Reports, Inc., a legal information and consulting firm that was sold in 2007. He has degrees from Yale University, the New School University, Cornell Law School and the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s School. He lives with his wife, Anne, and extraordinary dog, Barkley, in Arlington, Virginia and Canandaigua, New York.

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed