Persimmon Alley Press
Persimmon Alley Press
  • About Persimmon Alley Press
  • Books
    • Close Encounters with the Cold War
    • Mother's Century: A Survivor, Her People and Her Times
    • Encounters: Ten Appointments with History
    • Killer Protocols
    • Clean Coal Killers
    • The Killer Trees
    • A Feast of Famine
    • Molly Malice in Alterland
    • Alligator In My Basement
    • Sudden Addiction
    • The Flesh of the Cedarwood
  • Smoke the Dottle
  • Richard's Rants
  • Contact

Rant 677: Putin and the Nuclear Option

3/5/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
The most disquieting news out of Moscow since child-murderer Vladimir Putin launched his criminal war against Ukraine was his announcement that he had put Russia’s nuclear forces “on high alert,” accompanied by a threat that anyone who stands in his way “…must know that Russia will respond immediately, and the consequences will be such as you have never seen in your entire history.” To date, the U.S. and NATO do not appear to be taking this threat seriously. That must change.
 
One can interpret Putin’s declaration as a threat of nuclear strikes against any Western country that might militarily intervene against Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. What we don’t know is Putin’s definition of “Western military intervention.” It may be merely providing Ukraine with weapons, which a number of NATO countries—as well as non-member states like Sweden—are doing. Moreover, Russia carried out nuclear exercises in late February.
 
Russia expert Fiona Hill, formerly the senior director for European and Russian affairs at the National Security Council under Trump, warns that Putin really might use nuclear weapons and that he had tried to warn Trump about his willingness to do so, but Trump didn’t understand the warning. Russia’s recent history of going to extreme lengths—poisonings with radioactive polonium and the Novichok nerve agent are indicators, Hill said, that Putin will stop at nothing to get his way. She also believes that Putin will not stop at Ukraine unless the Western response deters him.
 
Similar to the United States’ five Defense Readiness Conditions (DEFCONs), Russia has four levels of nuclear alert: 1. CONSTANT. 2. ELEVATED. 3. MILITARY DANGER. 4. FULL. Putin’s high alert translates to level 2, ELEVATED. The Pentagon announced that there has been no change in our nuclear posture, but it never tells the public which DEFCON level applies. Defense experts surmise that, in response to Putin’s move, the U.S. is now at DEFCON 3 (DEFCON 5 is the lowest state of readiness, while DEFCON 1 means nuclear war). We have only declared DEFCON 2 twice (both during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis).
 
The question before us is what would it take for Putin to use nuclear weapons? Would he go to that extreme if his invasion of Ukraine is not going well? Would nukes be on the table if the West’s squeeze of the Russian economy threatens his rule? And if he did deploy nukes—presumably tactical, not strategic weapons—how, if at all, would the U.S. respond? We have only a small tactical nuclear capability remaining in Europe after we decommissioned and removed 98 percent of our European tactical nukes in 1989-91. We likely only have around 100 air-launched tactical, nuclear bombs at six bases in Europe and Turkey. Russia, in contrast, has almost 2,000 tactical nukes in its arsenal. Russia has also updated many of its tactical nuclear weapons, introduced new ones and is improving its delivery capabilities.
 
In December, Russia’s ally Belarus, allowed Russia to place tactical nuclear weapons within the country. Belarus borders three NATO member nations.
 
The answer depends to a great extent on Putin’s mental state, something the U.S. intelligence community is deeply worried about. Given the recklessness of his Ukraine aggression, it may not be far-fetched to conclude that the increasingly paranoid and isolated Russian president has “lost it” and gone off the deep end mentally. If that is the case, then we might be uncomfortably close to witnessing the first use of nuclear weapons in 77 years.
 
Going nuclear is not limited to the employment of atomic weapons. Putin may already be playing the second nuclear card, a dirty bomb. He has captured Chernobyl, site of the worst nuclear disaster ever, and followed that up with nabbing the Zaporizhzhia power station (after recklessly shelling it and starting a fire), home to six nuclear reactors that provide 25 percent of Ukraine’s electricity. Both sites contain massive amounts of highly radioactive material that, if unleashed, could wreak unimaginable devastation. If the Russians cut off Zaporizhzhia’s power, the reactor cores could melt down and spread radioactive fallout across Ukraine and beyond. Europeans, who are most at risk, are stocking up on potassium iodide pills that offer some small protection from radioactive fallout. Given his appalling rocket attack on Zaporizhzhia, the intelligence community’s concern about Putin’s mental state is well-founded.
 
Russia no longer has a Politburo that, during the Cold War, acted as a counterweight to its supreme leader. In 1953, the Politburo had Secret Police Chief Lavrenty Beria arrested, tried and executed, fearing his ruthlessness and consolidation of power. In 1964, Communist Party Chairman Nikita Khrushchev was ousted by the Politburo for his deviation from the strict Stalinist line, among other things. Today, however, the absence of a Politburo means that there is no potential top-level opposition to Putin. The oligarchs that have supported him likely are not sufficiently organized to stage a coup d’état. Whether the top ranks of the Russian military could or would stage a coup is open to question.
 
Putin has broken many norms in his two decades in power. Breaking the nuclear taboo is not out of the question. The U.S. and NATO should assume the worst case and prepare accordingly. The risk of a miscalculation by either side is too great to ignore. The time for thinking the unthinkable is now.
 
Richard Hermann
March 5, 2022

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    Richard Hermann is the author of thirteen books, including Encounters: Ten Appointments with History and, most recently, Mother's Century: A Survivor, Her People and Her Times. Soon to be released is his upcoming Close Encounters with the Cold War, a personal reflection on growing up in the nuclear age. He is a former law professor and entrepreneur, and the founder and president of Federal Reports, Inc., a legal information and consulting firm that was sold in 2007. He has degrees from Yale University, the New School University, Cornell Law School and the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s School. He lives with his wife, Anne, and extraordinary dog, Barkley, in Arlington, Virginia and Canandaigua, New York.

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed