Persimmon Alley Press
Persimmon Alley Press
  • About Persimmon Alley Press
  • Books
    • Close Encounters with the Cold War
    • Mother's Century: A Survivor, Her People and Her Times
    • Encounters: Ten Appointments with History
    • Killer Protocols
    • Clean Coal Killers
    • The Killer Trees
    • A Feast of Famine
    • Molly Malice in Alterland
    • Alligator In My Basement
    • Sudden Addiction
    • The Flesh of the Cedarwood
  • Smoke the Dottle
  • Richard's Rants
  • Contact

Rant 710: Coming Soon: The Most Important Supreme Court Case Ever

10/14/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
​The 2022-2023 Supreme Court term threatens to be perhaps even more consequential than the prior term, which witnessed the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the weakening of barriers between church and state, the reining in of federal regulatory authority, the denial of climate change, the exaltation of the Second Amendment over public safety, and other appalling decisions that gave a clear indication that the Court’s conservative majority is virtually an arm of the Republican Party.
 
What, asks the majority of Americans, could possibly be worse than that? The answer is a case called Moore v. Harper. At issue is a dubious constitutional argument heretofore relegated to the extreme outlying precincts of the authoritarian wing of the Republican Party. If endorsed by the Supreme Court, this “Independent State Legislature” theory would open the door to dramatically changing our elections, including allowing state legislatures to overturn the popular will and substitute their own slate of presidential electors for those chosen by the people.
 
The Constitution authorizes the states to administer federal elections, subject to Congressional overrule. The question arises as to the meaning of that delegation. The Elections Clause (Article I, §4) states: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, ….. In addition, the Presidential Electors Clause (Article II, §1, Clause 2, states: Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors….
 
The debate conjured by Trumpian zealots intent on stealing future elections turns on the word “legislature.” Both general understanding and Court precedents going back many years is that it refers to a state’s general lawmaking processes, including not only legislative action, but also whatever a state’s constitution says about subjecting legislation to a governor’s veto, a voter referendum, and state court action to ensure that legislative enactments comply with the state constitution.
 
Would be election thieves argue that these federal constitutional clauses give state legislatures exclusive authority to regulate federal elections, period. In practice, this would mean that state legislatures could not be stopped by whatever the state constitution says about a governor’s veto, a citizen referendum or a state court’s authority to approve or disapprove legislation.
 
If the Independent State Legislature theory had been effective in 2020, Donald Trump would have been able to steal the election and stay in the White House despite having been stomped by Joe Biden in both the popular vote and Electoral College. If the Supreme Court endorses this theory, it would allow Republicans to run roughshod over the will of voters. Should Trump somehow weasel out of his mounting legal challenges, is not yet strung up, is not behind bars, and runs for president in 2024 and loses, no big deal. Republican state legislatures could ignore the popular vote and legitimate electors and legally substitute their own slates of sham electors.
 
Of lesser concern, but still a huge problem, state legislators would have carte blanche to gerrymander and suppress the vote as contemptibly as possible without any opportunity for opponents to challenge their nefarious machinations in court.
 
The fate of our democracy has never before been threatened by any Supreme Court case or decision in our history. Moore v. Harper does that, and has a good chance of establishing this preposterous and dangerous theory that makes a mockery of Checks and Balances and the rule of law. Three current Supreme Court Justices—Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas (of course)--In various dissents and concurrences, have already signed on to the Independent State Legislature hooey. Two more and you can say so long to future free, fair and honest elections, not to mention American democracy.
 
Dick Hermann
October 14, 2022

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    Richard Hermann is the author of thirteen books, including Encounters: Ten Appointments with History and, most recently, Mother's Century: A Survivor, Her People and Her Times. Soon to be released is his upcoming Close Encounters with the Cold War, a personal reflection on growing up in the nuclear age. He is a former law professor and entrepreneur, and the founder and president of Federal Reports, Inc., a legal information and consulting firm that was sold in 2007. He has degrees from Yale University, the New School University, Cornell Law School and the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s School. He lives with his wife, Anne, and extraordinary dog, Barkley, in Arlington, Virginia and Canandaigua, New York.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed