Persimmon Alley Press
Persimmon Alley Press
  • About Persimmon Alley Press
  • Books
    • Close Encounters with the Cold War
    • Mother's Century: A Survivor, Her People and Her Times
    • Encounters: Ten Appointments with History
    • Killer Protocols
    • Clean Coal Killers
    • The Killer Trees
    • A Feast of Famine
    • Molly Malice in Alterland
    • Alligator In My Basement
    • Sudden Addiction
    • The Flesh of the Cedarwood
  • Smoke the Dottle
  • Richard's Rants
  • Contact

Rant 760: Supreme Court Jive

10/7/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture
​“…the arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice.”
–Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
 
During the last half of the 20th century, the U.S. Supreme Court did, in fact, make manifest Dr. King’s optimistic declaration. The Court’s decisions, for the most part, moved the country forward to a better place: rulings on discrimination, voting rights, criminal justice, race relations, marriage, privacy and other fundamental matters deeply affecting all of us bent the country toward justice.
 
Not so much anymore. We have come to expect, alas, that Supreme Court terms will be unsettling. The 21st century rendition of the Court, increasingly with each term, has reversed direction, bending the arc the other way. The last two Supreme Court terms witnessed a retreat with respect to many of the advances of the prior century.
 
The 2023-24 Supreme Court term just began and we can expect that it will prove to be equally tumultuous. The Court will consider a docket full of cases the decisions in which will impact heavily on every one of us as well as on the future of our increasingly fragile democratic republic. Some of the key cases that could continue the Court’s backsliding-to-the-future include:
 
Whether domestic abusers should be allowed to have guns. The Court’s decision will go a long way toward telling us just how sacrosanct the Second Amendment is. Justice Thomas’s nonsensical standard that a gun law is valid only if it is rooted in our early history and tradition could skew the outcome in favor of wife-beaters, mindful that until the second half of the 19th century, women were deemed the property of their husbands to do with whatever they wished.
 
A series of cases threaten the rulemaking authority of administrative agencies. The first case to get a hearing contests the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an Obama construct that the hard right hates and has attempted to bring down before. The totality of these cases, if upheld by the Court that last term viewed such challenges sympathetically, could severely weaken the full panoply of health, safety, business and other regulations.
 
Racial gerrymandering. The Court will decide whether the South Carolina legislature’s congressional district redraw, which moved 30,000 African-American voters between districts in order to make a district safer for Republicans, violated the Voting Rights Act. South Carolina claims that the adjustment was purely for political reasons with no racial intent. Uh huh.
 
Social media content moderation. The Court will examine whether Florida and Texas laws regulating social media violate the First Amendment’s Free Speech clause. Both states’ restrictive measures were prompted by conservative complaints that Facebook, X, et al., favor liberal posts and discriminate against right-wing ones. Given the barrage of reactionary misinformation countenanced by both platforms, this is a hard argument to make.
 
What makes this term all the more fraught is that this Court is rapidly establishing itself as the most corrupt in history. Two justices—Thomas and Alito—swim in sleaze. A steady stream of new revelations about their unsavory relationships with right-wing ideologues/zillionaires, often with business before the Court, keeps being uncovered by the media. To date, revelations of their smarmy doings have failed to constrain their disgraceful conduct. They continue to sit on cases that cry out for recusal, and continue to vote against the interests of the citizenry. Watching all of this, the weakest Chief Justice in history sticks his head in the sand, refusing not only to institute a serious ethics code, but is also too timid to enforce the feeble one that currently applies.
 
Two other justices should not even be on the Court, but are thanks to the sordid maneuverings of Mitch McConnell, whose hypocrisy vis-a-vis Court appointments gives new meaning to the term, “brazen.” To top it off, the third of the hard-right Trump appointees won his seat despite a strongly alleged history of boozy sexual aggression. This cast of character-less characters defines this Court as the most partisan and reactionary in history, the Taney Court that decided Dred Scott (upholding the Fugitive Slave Act) and the Fuller Court that decided Plessy v. Ferguson (endorsing segregation) notwithstanding.
 
In 2000, 62 percent of Americans surveyed had a positive view of the Court. Today, only 40 percent believe that the Court is an honorable institution. The plummet in Court approval is understandable given the torrent of horrible decisions that have come down from the Court on issues such as campaign finance, guns, abortion, the environment, voting rights, etc., overlaid by the Court’s abandonment of any pretense that it has a moral center. What is incomprehensible is that four in ten Americans still believe that the Court is doing a good job.
 
Dick Hermann
October 7, 2023

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    Richard Hermann is the author of thirteen books, including Encounters: Ten Appointments with History and, most recently, Mother's Century: A Survivor, Her People and Her Times. Soon to be released is his upcoming Close Encounters with the Cold War, a personal reflection on growing up in the nuclear age. He is a former law professor and entrepreneur, and the founder and president of Federal Reports, Inc., a legal information and consulting firm that was sold in 2007. He has degrees from Yale University, the New School University, Cornell Law School and the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s School. He lives with his wife, Anne, and extraordinary dog, Barkley, in Arlington, Virginia and Canandaigua, New York.

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed